CVE-2026-64560

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec() race

Wongi and Jungwoo decoded and reported a non-leader exec() related race which can result in an UAF:

sys_timer_delete() exec() posix_cpu_timer_del() // Observes old leader p = pid_task(pid, pid_type); de_thread() switch_leader(); release_task(old_leader) __exit_signal(old_leader) sighand = lock(old_leader, sighand); posix_cpu_timers*_exit(); sighand = lock_task_sighand(p) unhash_task(old_leader); sh = lock(p, sighand) old_leader->sighand = NULL; unlock(sighand); (p->sighand == NULL) unlock(sh) return NULL;

// Returns without action if(!sighand) return 0; free_posix_timer();

This is "harmless" unless the deleted timer was armed and enqueued in p->signal because on exec() a TGID targeted timer is inherited.

As sys_timer_delete() freed the underlying posix timer object run_posix_cpu_timers() or any timerqueue related add/delete operations on other timers will access the freed object's timerqueue node, which results in an UAF.

There is a similar problem vs. posix_cpu_timer_set(). For regular posix timers it just transiently returns -ESRCH to user space, but for the use case in do_cpu_nanosleep() it's the same UAF just that the k_itimer is allocated on the stack.

Also posix_cpu_timer_rearm() fails to rearm the timer, which means it stops to expire.

While debating solutions Frederic pointed out another problem:

posix_cpu_timer_del(tmr) __exit_signal(p) posix_cpu_timers*_exit(p); unhash_task(p); p->sighand = NULL; sh = lock_task_sighand(p) sighand = p->sighand; if (!sighand) return NULL; lock(sighand);

 if (!sh)
WARN_ON_ONCE(timer_queued(tmr));

On weakly ordered architectures it is not guaranteed that posix_cpu_timer_del() will observe the stores in...